Uzbekistan

  • Public bribery

  • Commercial bribery

  • Extraterritorial applicability of criminal laws

Contributed by Kosta Legal

Law correct as at March 2021 

1 What are the laws relating to anti-corruption, bribery, and money laundering in your country?

In the Republic of Uzbekistan, the following laws and regulations apply:

  • The Anti-Corruption Law (Law No. O‘RQ-419 O’zbekiston Respublikasining "Korrupsiyaga qarshi kurashish to’g’risida"gi Qonuni).
  • The Law on Counteracting Legalization of the Proceeds of Crime, Terrorism Financing and Financing Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (Law No. 660-II O’zbekiston Respublikasining "Jinoiy faoliyatdan olingan daromadlarni legallashtirishga, terrorizmni moliyalashtirishga va ommaviy qirg’in qurolini tarqatishni moliyalashtirishga qarshi kurashish to’g’risida"gi Qonuni).
  • Articles 611, 1931 and 1932 of the Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Administrative Liability (O’zbekiston Respublikasining Ma’muriy javobgarlik to’g’risidagi kodeksi) establishing administrative liability for some types of corruption.
  • Article 1793 of the Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Administrative Liability establishing administrative liability for a violation of the law on counteracting legalization of the proceeds of crime, terrorism financing and financing proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
  • Articles 1929, 19210 and Articles 210 to 214 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (O’zbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat kodeksi) criminalizing different types of corruption.
  • Articles 171, 243 of the Uzbek Criminal Code criminalizing money laundering.

2 Do the following persons or bodies have the right to be informed, or is the company obliged to inform the following persons/bodies, about an internal investigation before it is commenced? Do they have the right to participate in the investigation (e.g., in interviews)?

  1. Employee representative bodies, such as a works council or union.
    There is no legal obligation to inform employee representative bodies of internal investigations, except for cases of industrial accidents or instances where the health of employees has been injured. For these cases, Uzbek labor laws provide a specific order, in accordance with which, employee representative bodies shall be informed of and participate in internal investigations.

    Notwithstanding this, the internal compliance policies of a company may regulate general notification and participation procedures for employee representative bodies in relation to internal investigations.
  2. Data protection officer or data privacy authority.
    Not required by law.
  3. Other local authorities.
    Not required by law.

    What are the consequences of non-compliance?
    Where the internal compliance policies of a company stipulate that the employee representative bodies have the right to be informed and/or participate in internal investigations, and where an employer or an authorized person, impedes on that right, they may face administrative liability and fines.

3 Do employees have a duty to support the investigation, for instance by participating in interviews? Is there anything a company can do to require employees to support an investigation (e.g., advance consents)? Can companies impose disciplinary measures if an employee refuses to cooperate?

Under Uzbek laws, employees are not under a duty to support internal investigations. However, where the company's internal policies place an obligation on employees to support internal investigations, the employee may face disciplinary sanctions if they fail to comply.

4 Can any labor law deadlines or statute of limitations be triggered, or any rights to sanction employees be waived, by investigative actions? How can this be avoided?

Under Uzbek laws internal investigations do not trigger any labor law deadlines or statutes of limitations, nor do they waive the right to sanction employees.

As a general rule under the Uzbek Labor Code, disciplinary measures for violation of labor discipline must be imposed and applied by the employer in relation to employees within one month from the date the misconduct was detected.

Disciplinary measures cannot be imposed more than six months from the date the misconduct was committed. However, where the misconduct was detected during an inspection by the relevant state authorities, disciplinary measure must be imposed within two years.

.

5 Are there relevant data privacy laws, state secret laws, or blocking statutes in your country that have to be taken into account before:

  1. Conducting interviews?
    In accordance with the provisions of the Law on Personal Data (No. O‘RQ-547 O‘zbekiston Respublikasining "Shaxsga doir ma’lumotlar to‘g‘risida"gi Qonuni), where an interviewer obtains personal data (recorded on electronic, paper and/or in any other tangible carriers), the following conditions must be taken into account: (i) personal data cannot be collected and processed without the prior informed consent of the owner; (ii) personal data can only be used for the purposes for which it was obtained; (iii) the owner of the personal data may request to have this data classified as confidential; and (iv) the owner may request updates and clarifications on the use of their personal data.

    A person who violates personal data laws can be subject to administrative or criminal liability.
  2. Reviewing emails?
    The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan (O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Konstitutsiyasi) notes that everyone is entitled to protection against interference with his privacy, including privacy of correspondence. Therefore, reviewing personal emails without prior consent of the owner is considered a violation and can lead to administrative or criminal liability.

    There is a lack of regulation specifically focusing on the utilization and review of employees' corporate emails by an employer. Therefore, a company’s internal policies may contain appropriate provisions regarding the employer’s right to access employees' corporate emails. Subsequently, these policies may also prohibit the personal use of corporate emails.
  3. Collecting (electronic) documents and/or other information?
    The same rules mentioned in section (a) apply to documents and/or other information which contains personal data.

    Otherwise, the requirements of the Law on Protection of State Secrets (No. 848-XII O’zbekiston Respublikasining "Davlat sirlarini saqlash to’g’risida"gi Qonuni) should be taken into account when collecting any information, which constitutes state secrets. Notably, the disclosure or conveyance of state secrets shall lead to criminal liability.
  4. Analyzing accounting and/or other mere business databases?
    In accordance with the Law on Financial Accounting (No. 279-I O‘zbekiston Respublikasining "Buxgalteriya hisobi to‘g‘risida"gi Qonuni), accounting information is deemed to be confidential. Thus, anyone who has access to such information must keep its confidentiality.

    Any breach of confidentiality shall lead to administrative or criminal liability.

6 Do any specific procedures need to be considered in case a whistleblower report sets off an internal investigation (e.g. for whistleblower protection)?

Uzbek laws do not provide any specific procedures which need to be considered in cases where a whistle-blower report sets off an investigation.

Nevertheless, individuals, and legal entities have the right to report corruption offenses to appropriate state authorities. Under Anti-Corruption Law No. O‘RQ-419, such persons are protected by the state.

7 Before conducting employee interviews in your country, must the interviewee:

  1. Receive written instructions?
    Not required by law.
  2. Be informed that they must not make statements that would mean any kind of self-incrimination?
    Not required by law unless the interview is conducted in the process of criminal investigation.
  3. Be informed that the lawyer attending the interview is the lawyer for the company and not the lawyer for the interviewee (so-called Upjohn warning)?
    Not required by law.
  4. Be informed that they have the right to have their lawyer attend?
    Not required by law unless the interview is conducted in the process of criminal investigation.
  5. Be informed that they have the right to have a representative from the works council (or other employee representative body) attend?
    Not required by law. However, a company’s internal documents (policies, collective agreements) may grant employees the right to have a representative from the works council or other employee representative body present.
  6. Be informed that data may be transferred across borders (in particular to the United States of America)?
    Where data obtained is considered to be personal, its owner shall be informed that it may be transferred across borders.

    In general, as per the Law on Personal Data No. O‘RQ-547, personal data (recorded on electronic, paper and/or other tangible carriers) cannot be collected and processed (including transferred across borders) without the owner’s prior informed consent and can only be used for the purposes for which it was collected.
  7. Sign a data privacy waiver?
    Uzbek laws do not require an interviewee to sign a data privacy waiver before being interviewed.

    Nevertheless, as previously mentioned, an interviewer is prohibited from collecting and processing the interviewee’s personal data without their prior informed consent.
  8. Be informed that the information gathered might be passed on to third parties, including local or foreign authorities
    Where information gathered is considered to be personal data, it cannot be passed on to third parties unless the owner of the personal data is informed, and his/her consent is obtained.
  9. Be informed that written notes will be taken?
    Unless the notes contain the employee’s personal data, employers are not obligated to inform employees that written notes will be taken during an interview.

8 Are document-hold notices or document-retention notices allowed in your country? Are there any specific rules that need to be followed (point in time, form, sender, addressees)?

There is no particular regulation in Uzbekistan on document hold or document retention notices.

9 Can attorney-client privilege (legal advice privilege) be claimed over findings of the internal investigation? What steps may be taken to ensure privilege is maintained?

In accordance with the Law on Advocacy (No. 349-I O‘zbekiston Respublikasining "Advokatura to‘g‘risida"gi Qonuni) and the Law on Guarantees of Advocacy and Social Protection of Attorneys (No. 721-I O‘zbekiston Respublikasining "Advokatlik faoliyatining kafolatlari va advokatlarning ijtimoiy himoyasi to‘g‘risida"gi Qonuni), all information and material received by an attorney from its client are the subject to advocacy secret (attorney-client privilege), thus, attorney-client privilege may apply to the findings of an internal investigation.

In order to claim attorney-client privilege an external attorney should be engaged under a contractual agreement for the provision of legal assistance. Under the agreement, the attorney should be instructed to conduct the investigation and be provided with all the evidence, findings, and documents produced during the investigation.

10 Can attorney-client privilege also apply to in-house counsel in your country?

As per Uzbek laws attorney-client privilege does not apply to in-house counsel.

11 Are any early notifications required when starting an investigation?

  1. To insurance companies (D&O insurance, etc.) to avoid losing insurance coverage.
    Not required by law but early notifications might be required under insurance contracts and policies.
  2. To business partners (e.g., banks and creditors).
    Not required by law but it might be required by way of contract.
  3. To shareholders.
    Not required by law but it might be required under a company's constitutional documents.
  4. To authorities.
    Not required by law.

12 Are there any other immediate measures that have to be taken in your country, or would be expected by the authorities once an investigation starts, e.g., any particular immediate reaction to the alleged conduct?

In Uzbekistan, there are no legal requirements or guidelines regarding the performance of internal investigations.

13 Is there a duty to self-report the discovered misconduct to prosecuting authorities?

The Uzbek Criminal Code provides for a criminal liability of individuals for: (i) a failure to report a conclusively known serious or especially serious crime being prepared or having been committed; and (ii) a failure to report a conclusively known impending or committed terrorist crime.

Moreover, certain organizations (such as banks, exchange members, professional securities market participants, insurance companies, law firms etc.) engaged in monetary operations or operations with other property, are obliged to report suspicious transactions to the Department for Combating Tax, Currency Crimes and Legalization of Criminal Proceeds under the General Prosecutor's Office of Uzbekistan. This includes cases where: (i) there are suspicions that a transaction is aimed at legitimizing the proceeds of crime or terrorism financing, or (ii) one of the parties to the transaction is involved or suspected to be participating in terrorist activity.

In turn, employees of state authorities are obliged to notify their supervisor or law enforcement agencies of all cases where a person orders or incites them to commit corrupt offenses. Employees should also notify their supervisor or law enforcement if another state authority employee commits such offenses.

14 If local prosecuting authorities become aware of an internal investigation, would they interfere in it or ask for specific steps to be followed?

Prosecuting authorities shall start to act (i.e., carry out preliminary inquiry or formal criminal investigation), only when they become aware of a crime committed or being prepared. Reasons to act shall consist of: (i) complaints filed by individuals; (ii) communications submitted by enterprises, organizations, institutions, public associations, and officials; (iii) communications in mass media; (iv) discovery of information and marks, showing indicia of an offense, immediately by an inquiry agency, inquiry officer, investigator, prosecutor, or court, or (v) a voluntary surrender.

In such cases, information and circumstances revealed during an internal investigation might be investigated by prosecuting authorities.

15 Please describe the legal prerequisites for search warrants or dawn raids on companies in your country. If the prerequisites are not fulfilled, can the evidence gathered still be used against the company?

In accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksi), search and seizure can be conducted by resolution of the inquiry officer or investigator and with the sanction of a prosecutor. The ruling of the court may also authorize the inquiry body or the investigator to conduct a search or seizure.

In urgent cases, a search may be performed without a prosecutor’s sanction, however, the prosecutor must be informed of the search within 24 hours. The investigator or inquiry officer must substantiate the urgency of the case to the prosecutor.

A resolution or ruling on conducting a search or seizure shall indicate who should be subject to a search and seizure, where it should take place and what items and documents must be detected and seized.

An attesting witness and, if required, a specialist or translator should participate in the search and seizure. The search and seizure within the premises of enterprises, institutions, organizations, and military units shall be conducted in the presence of representatives thereof.

Where there has been a violation of the search and seizure procedures, and evidence is found or collected in the course of the search and seizure, this evidence is of no legal value.

16 Would voluntary self-disclosure or cooperation with state authorities help avoid or mitigate liability? What are the requirements to obtain the cooperation credit?

The Uzbek Criminal Code provides a non-exhaustive list of mitigating circumstances, which shall be taken into account by courts when administering a penalty. Such circumstances include voluntary surrender, active repentance, assistance in crime detection, and voluntary expiation of a harm.

Thus, voluntary self-disclosure and/or cooperation with state authorities may help avoid or mitigate liability, if such circumstances are considered by the court as mitigating for particular cases.

17 Are deals, non-prosecution agreements, or deferred prosecution agreements available and common for corporations in your jurisdiction?

Non-prosecution agreements and deferred prosecution agreements are not available under Uzbek laws.

18 What types of penalties (e.g., fines, imprisonment, disgorgement, or debarment) could companies, directors, officers, or employees face for misconduct of (other) individuals of the company?

Uzbek laws do not provide for liability of companies, directors, or employees for misconduct of other individuals of the company.

The only exception is that, under the Uzbek Civil Code (O’zbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik kodeksi), the employer shall redress the injury inflicted by its employee during the performance of official labor duties.

19 Can penalties for companies, their directors, officers, or employees be reduced or suspended if the company can demonstrate an efficient compliance system? Does this only apply in cases where efficient compliance systems have been implemented prior to the alleged misconduct?

There is no particular regulation on this issue under the Uzbek law.

20 Please briefly describe any investigation trends in your country (e.g., recent case law, upcoming legislative changes, or special public attention on certain topics).

Being a participant of the Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan ("Action Plan"), the Republic of Uzbekistan has undertaken a number of key reforms in the area of anti-corruption policies. For instance, in order to be compliant with the Action Plan recommendations, and fully comply with the United Nations Convention against corruption, a statutory definition of certain types of investigative measures was introduced.

Uzbekistan is moving towards compliance with new recommendations, including: (i) establishing laws on the anonymous reporting (whistle-blowing) of possible corruption crimes that are verifiable; (ii) raising the effectiveness of the use of financial monitoring information for initiating criminal cases on corruption, ensuring a wider use of financial monitoring data in criminal prosecution of such crimes; (iii) providing investigative authorities engaged in financial investigations, direct access to the databases of tax and customs authorities, property registries – subject to the protection of personal data, and (iv) expanding the provisions of the Uzbek Criminal Procedure Code on international cooperation in criminal matters, including regulating the procedure for conducting interrogations under the request of foreign law enforcement authorities, including interrogations by means of a video or telephone conference; (v) expanding the provisions of the Uzbek Criminal Procedure Code on the procedure for tracing, arresting and confiscating assets, on the procedure for creating and operating joint investigative teams and providing grounds for refusal to provide mutual legal assistance.

Vazgen Grigoryan
Kosta Legal, Partner
T +998 71 2090240
vgrigoryan@kostalegal.com


Vazgen Grigoryan is one of the Uzbekistan’s most highly regarded litigators, financial, and corporate law practitioners. He has vast experience in advising clients on complex cross-border commercial litigation cases, regulatory enforcement proceedings and multi-jurisdictional investigations, corporate restructurings and insolvency, as well as bank financing. Vazgen’s work over the past 20 years has covered a full range of corporate and financial litigation matters, including acting for foreign investment banks in disputes arising out of using financial instruments and letters of credit and advising the world’s largest multinational corporations in investment disputes involving the Uzbek state.

Being an exceptionally strong commercial litigation practitioner and a recognized specialist in the area of corporate and financial law, Vazgen is recognized as "one of the best litigators in the market" and a "reliable partner" by the Chambers & Partners Asia-Pacific guide.


Ernest Khachaturyan
Kosta Legal, Associate
T +998 71 2090240
ekhachaturyan@kostalegal.com
Ernest Khachaturyan obtained his law degree with a specialization in commercial law from Westminster International University in Tashkent.

Ernest is an Associate with strong experience in complex commercial and corporate dispute resolution cases and arbitration proceedings. He regularly assists local and foreign companies in a wide range of related matters, helping senior lawyers in developing relevant dispute resolution strategies, participating in litigation and arbitration procedures, advising on initiating disputes in courts and arbitration tribunals.